Posts Tagged ‘Freedom’

h1

Kashmir – Your Day Will Come InshaAllah.

February 5, 2010

11-30-kashmir-on-the-wall-1

MUST READ articles that have appeared on PKKH on Kashmir:

State Terror in Occupied Kashmir
Pakistan’s Present and Future War
India: Let Kashmir go
Focus on Kashmir
India’s problems lie within | Guardian, UK
Behind Mumbai Lies Kashmir | Eric Margolis
Mr Zardari, Do these look like Terrorists?
Pakistani Hindus rally to support Islamic Charity
Lashkar Bashing | Dan Qayyum
Ghettoisation of Muslims in India | Imran Ali and Yoginder Sikand
Why India should look within. | Dan Qayyum
Pak Flag: Symbol Of Freedom In India! | Ahmed Quraishi
Israel to train Indian Forces
Kashmir – the Forgotten Occupation
Land and Freedom – Arundhati Roy, The Guardian, UK
Hai Haq Hamara, Azadi
Peaceful Protests In Kashmir Alter Equation for India – Washington Post
A Jihad Grows in Kashmir
We are Pakistanis – Says Geelani
India, minus the K word – Jug Suraiya | Times of India
Kashmiris in India Savour Sense of Freedom – LA Times
Mission Kashmir – Times of India Editorial

42-20656594

42-21678396

42-21615477

42-16623906

h1

A Leader of Men

December 25, 2009

Malaika Khalid

The poetic dream of Allama Iqbal caught the imagination of the Muslims of Sub Continent under the dynamic leadership of Quaid e Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah who embarked upon the task of giving it a concrete shape of ideals and dreams. He structured and organized the comprehensive campaign for Pakistan, his audacious, adventurous, creativeness crystallized Dr. Muhammad Iqbal’s inspiration of Pakistan. The imagination and thought provoking message of Allama Iqbal was interpreted into realization when Baba-e-Quam Muhammad Ali Jinnah said:

“We are a nation, with our own distinctive culture and civilization, language and literature, art and architecture, names and nomenclature, sense of value and proportion, legal laws and moral code, customs and calendar, history and traditions, aptitudes and ambitions, in short, we have distinctive outlook on and of life”.

Mr. Jinnah determined and toiled, aimed and struggled. He attained the aims and accomplished the goal he had set before him. He was a man of strong will power, determination as well as had a lofty character. He worked day and night and never bent down even to the greatest temptation. His friends and adversaries both appreciated and respected him. It was he who shaped the Pakistan Movement in tough resistance by Hindus as well as British, and therefore got a separate homeland for the Muslims of the Sub Continent.

Read the rest of this entry ?

h1

Indian Elections In Kashmir: The Impact On Freedom

August 26, 2009

4264522640-thousands-march-in-kashmir-to-honour-slain-leader

State assembly elections have been held in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir in the past and are likely to continue to be held in the future. If history is any guide, it can safely be inferred that they will neither be accepted by the people of Jammu and Kashmir as a substitute to the right to self-determination or plebiscite, nor they diminish freedom sentiments in the valley.

Read Full Report by Awais Bin Wasi

Related:
Pak Flag Hoisted, Tricolour Burnt in Srinagar
Forget AfPak, Resolve AfKash To Win In Afghanistan
Occupied Kashmiri paid with life for Pakistan’s love
Srinagar Celebrates Pakistan Win

h1

Pakistan: Tu Hi Mera Pyar Hai

August 12, 2009

Another production from the PKKH Media Crew

h1

Creation of Pakistan

August 11, 2009

Must Watch Video – Created by PKKH Media Team

h1

End of America

May 22, 2009

In The End of America: A Letter of Warning to a Young Patriot, Naomi Wolf takes a historical look at the rise of Fascism, outlining the 10 steps necessary for a Fascistic group (or government) to destroy the democratic character of a nation-state and subvert the social/political liberty previously exercised by its citizens, she further explains how it was done in Nazi-Germany, Fascist Italy and how the blue-prints were followed by Bush Administration after 9/11.

Read the rest of this entry ?

h1

Lashkar: Indian Agencies Behind Lahore Attacks

March 8, 2009

Kashmiri militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba rejected media reports in India that it was involved in an attack on Sri Lanka’s cricket squad in Lahore.

“These media reports are false, incorrect and baseless,” Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) spokesman Abdullah Ghaznavi said. He was speaking by telephone from Srinagar from an undisclosed location.

“The attack on Sri Lanka’s team was an attack on Pakistan’s sovereignty and Kashmiri militants could never even think of that (such an attack),” Ghaznavi said.

LeT, which has been fighting for freedom from New Delhi’s rule in Indian-occupied Kashmir, blamed Indian security agencies for the Lahore attack.

“The attack is the handiwork of Indian agencies to defame Pakistan and bring instability to the country,” Ghaznavi said.

Lashkar-e-Taiba has often been blamed by India for terrorist acts within India. Most of these acts have subsequently been proved to have been carried out by Indian based Hindu extremist groups with support from serving Indian army officers.

Lashkar-e-Taiba has never been implicated in any terrorist activities on Pakistani soil and has a strict policy in this regard. They have in fact recently come under fire and recieved threats from CIA backed terrorist Baitullah Mehsud.

Mehsud’s ‘Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan’ (TTP) threatened attacking members of Lashkar-e-Taiba by pointing out that they only fight against Indian rule in Kashmir and do not support TTP’s version of ‘Jihad’ against Pakistani citizens.

Meanwhile, Pakistan’s interior ministry chief Rehman Malik said Friday he could not rule out foreign involvement in the Sri Lankan cricket attack.

“I cannot rule out (the involvement of a) foreign hand in the incident,” Malik told reporters in Lahore.

Related:
Lashkar Bashing
Baitullah Mehsud’s TTP Threatens Kashmiri Militants
Baitullah Mehsud’s Time Is Up

h1

Kashmir – Indian Nightmare Coming True.

March 2, 2009

“This year has not been good for India – first there was the aftermath of Mumbai, and then India’s worst nightmare came through–David Milliband mentioned the “K” word. To make it worse, he mentioned it in Delhi. To pour salt over the wounds, Mr. Milliband returned home and said that solving Kashmir was a policy of the UK. From then on it was an avalanche. Richard Holbrooke got appointed as a special adviser on Kashmir and Obama again mentioned Kashmir.”

Read Full Report | Moin Ansari

h1

Trailer: Kashmir – Journey to Freedom

February 11, 2009

42-17173296

Kashmir – Journey to Freedom

A film by Udi Aloni. [Official Site] | [IMDB]

This is the story of a stateless nation that has become a tragic and deadly war zone, a land enveloped in a night of terror for 60 years, and a people born with no choice but revolution or despair.

The people in Kashmir live under a terrible and unprecedented military occupation, which denies its own existence and remains invisible to the world. Before 1943, Kashmir was a distinctively peaceful region characterized by harmonious religious coexistence between its Muslim, Hindu, Sikh and Buddhist communities. But today, divided between India and Pakistan, and labeled as terrorists and fundamentalists, Kashmiris are trapped in the middle of a tense and bitter conflict that has already exploded in three full-scale wars, leading to the nuclearization of India and Pakistan.

This film tells the story of a new generation of young Muslims that, inspired by the Sufi culture and Kashmir’s long history of ethnic and religious coexistence, started a non-violent movement in the hopes for a new peace in this land of mythic beauty that straddles between two anxious and volatile nuclear powers.

Israeli director’s film on Kashmir earns Indian ire

Srinagar, Feb 09: Indian authorities have taken umbrage at Kashmir: Journey to Freedom and are refusing to allow American-Israeli director Udi Aloni to return to India, after his film was premiered in Panorama section, at the Berlin Film Festival which showcases independent and arthouse cinema.

Aloni tells how a new generation of young Muslim Kashmiris, after years of armed resistance, decide to lay down their arms and start a nonviolent resistance movement – in the hope of finally achieving peace and independence.

Read the rest of this entry ?

h1

Human Rights Watch: Letter to Kashmir CM

February 11, 2009

42-17173296

“Thousands of people remain victims of enforced disappearances in Jammu and Kashmir. The practices of “disappearances” and extrajudicial executions violate basic human rights, including the right to life, the right to liberty and security of the person, the right to a fair and public trial, as well as the prohibition on torture and cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment or punishment. Under international law, an enforced disappearance is a continuing crime until the “disappearance” is resolved.”

“While previous governments have admitted that many persons are missing, it was claimed that they had crossed the border into Pakistan to become militants. Yet, as you are aware, unmarked graves of those deemed to have been unidentified foreign militants are scattered all over Jammu and Kashmir. Many believe that these graves contain the remains of their loved ones who were picked up by security forces, killed in custody, and then falsely identified in police reports to be foreign militants, usually Pakistani citizens. In many cases, when relatives have succeeded in their demand to have graves exhumed, their claims have been found to be correct.”

Read the Full Letter from Human Rights Watch Executive Director Brad Adams to the Chief Minister of Occupied Kashmir, Omar Abdullah – Dated February 9th 2009 [LINK]

Related: Full List of Articles on Kashmir posted on PKKH

h1

Pakistan Is Not America’s ‘War Theater’

February 3, 2009

There is no doubt left that we are fast approaching a point where some form of military intervention will become a necessity, in a way that is diametrically different from the past. We, the civilians, will need to borrow the organizational capabilities of the Pakistani military to help civilians in power reshape the Pakistani state domestically and in terms of foreign policy.

Read the rest of this entry ?

h1

Focus on Kashmir

December 22, 2008

In order to achieve peace along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border, the US should help resolve the dispute over Kashmir

ae61gl2caskx3awca4dxsybcaawqntccasj98bjca0b11bdcah47c8zcaguydpucanmn7rzca3yq7b3cayg2647cahvwuzhca4v1vzlca616ejxcat02wewca1b8hvacamh2r9hcakvxjthcae6ame3ca2mn5d1 

Until the recent terror attacks in Mumbai, the incoming Obama administration might have been tempted to push the Kashmir dispute to the back burner. That is no longer possible. Kashmir is at the centre of the spreading web of crisis that now threatens to destabilise the subcontinent. As long as this conflict remains unsolved, there will be little hope for tranquillity in India, peace in Afghanistan or stability in Pakistan.

The standoff in Kashmir has for years been filed in the world’s “frozen conflicts” drawer, along with others in places like Nagorno-Karabagh andTransdinistria. Obama should pull it out of that drawer and place it near the top of his foreign policy priority list.

Since its earliest days as a nation, Pakistan has focused on what its leaders consider their single overwhelming security threat: India. Fear of India shapes all of Pakistan’s security policies. Why has Pakistan worked so hard to promote pro-Pakistani groups in Afghanistan, including a host of pro-Taliban warlords? Not simply because of Afghanistan itself, but because it wants to assure that Afghanistan does not tilt toward India.

President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan, who is deeply unhappy with Pakistan’s refusal or inability to crack down on militants in the border region, appears to be tilting just that way. He has allowed India to open consulates in several cities, and suggested that he might invite India to train Afghan troops or build dams near the Pakistani border. This drives Pakistan, and especially the powerful Inter-Services Intelligence agency, to paroxysms of fear and outrage. Many in the region believe the ISI was connected to the bombing of the Indian embassy in Kabul last July, in which more than 40 people were killed. Disturbing evidence ties the ISI to terrorists who staged the recent Mumbai attacks.

The ISI, for its part, believes India is using Afghan territory and assets to foment trouble inside Pakistan. It sees India’s hand, for example, behind ethnic upheaval in its western province of Baluchistan. Pakistan and India have turned Afghanistan into the scene of even more spy-versus-spy intrigue than it was during the days of the Great Game, when two different powers, Britain and Russia, jousted to control it.

Kashmir is the single greatest flashpoint in the troubled Pakistan-India relationship. The two countries fought wars there in 1947-48, 1965 and 1999. They and their proxies are still engaged in a relentless conflict amid the region’s magnificent lakes and hills. Bombings, assassinations and disappearances have been part of life for as long as most Kashmiri people can remember.

Both Pakistan and India claim that Kashmir is rightly theirs. Both support militant Kashmiri factions while insisting publicly that they do nothing of the kind. Each fears that the other wants to use Kashmir for hostile purposes.

No country can fairly be expected to make security concessions unless it feels safe. Pakistan will not move decisively to crush Taliban and al-Qaida forces as long as it sees those forces as part of its defence against spreading Indian power. That makes reshaping India-Pakistan relations a key priority for the US – and they cannot be reshaped without some resolution in Kashmir.

Untangling the Kashmir conflict will not be easy, but the stakes are high. Intensive diplomacy involving Washington, Islamabad and New Delhi might produce a formula for peace. Accords that have ended other communal conflicts, perhaps including the Belfast Agreement of 1998, could serve as models.

Officials of the incoming administration are suggesting that they may recommend sending more US troops to Afghanistan. This would be folly. Afghans have always rallied against foreign troops, and every time a US attack kills civilians in a “collateral damage” incident, more outraged Afghans turn to the Taliban. More broadly, no military strategy can work in Afghanistan as long as India and Pakistan use Afghan territory as a stage on which to play out their strategic rivalry.

Afghanistan will remain unstable until that rivalry is calmed. It will not be calmed as long as the Kashmir dispute rages. The road to stability in Afghanistan, then, runs first through Kashmir.

Stephen Kinzer | Guardian, UK

h1

Behind Mumbai Lies Kashmir

December 21, 2008

WASHINGTON December 15, 2008 | Eric Margolis

The respected US strategic think tank, RAND Corp, estimated that a nuclear exchange between India and Pakistan would initially kill two million people, wound 100 million, and send clouds of radioactive dust around the globe.

That was ten years ago. Since then, India and Pakistan have quadrupled their nuclear forces, which are now on high alert as a result of the Mumbai massacre earlier this month.

4264522640-thousands-march-in-kashmir-to-honour-slain-leaderFears an enraged India would attack Pakistan in revenge for the Mumbai massacre provoked great alarm here in Washington. So, too, the threat Islamabad would withdraw two Pakistani army corps supporting the US war in Afghanistan and redeploy them to face India.

In fact, India did come very closer to launching retaliatory military operations against Pakistan during the week of 7-14 December, according to sources close to the Pentagon.

Washington quickly forced Pakistan to arrest the leaders of the militant group Lashkar-e-Toiba that India blames for the attack. Fortunately, India’s commendable restraint and Pakistan’s action in shutting down Kashmiri militant groups defused the military crisis. But this palliative actions did nothing to address the underlying conflict between old foes India and Pakistan.

Lashkar was founded at the end of the anti-Soviet Afghan War to channel jihadist energies into a new struggle aimed at freeing the two-thirds of divided Kashmir ruled by India. Pakistan and India have fought three major wars over Kashmir since 1947 and countless skirmishes along their tense border.

Kashmir is India’s only Muslim majority state. Muslim Kashmiris have sought independence from India since 1947. Most desired union with Pakistan, though an important minority called for total independence of the Himalayan mountain state, a position opposed by both India and Pakistan. Kashmir’s Hindu and Sikh minority, about 35-40% of Kashmir’s 11 million citizens, wanted to remain part of the Indian Union.

In 1989, an anti-Indian uprising erupted. Some 22 Kashmiri Muslim jihadist groups, some secretly aided by Pakistani intelligence, battled 500,000 Indian troops and police in a brutal, dirty war marked by constant atrocities on both sides. In the process, between 40,000 and 80,000 Kashmiris died, the majority, Muslims. Indian human rights groups have repeatedly criticized India’s tactics of repression in Kashmir that have included collective punishment, arson, assassinations, and gang rapes of Muslim women.

I visited many of the Kashmiri mujihadin guerilla camps in the Pakistani-controlled third of Kashmir, clustered around Muzzafarabad, and accompanied Kashmiri mujihadin on their operations against Indian forces, as I recount in my book, `War at the Top of the World,’ which is all about Afghanistan and the 61-year old Indian-Pakistani conflict over Kashmir.

42-20838373Two jihadi groups, Lashkar and Jaish-e-Mohammed, ran the biggest camps. Both were armed and financed until 2002 by ISI, Pakistan’s intelligence service which used them as proxies in Kashmir and as a way of keeping India off balance and on the defensive.

India and the US quickly condemned Lashkar and other Kashmiri jihadis of the Mumbai outrage. Delhi accused Pakistan and ISI of being behind the murderous attacks, but has yet to offer proof to outsiders. India routinely blames ISI for violent incidents. Pakistan, in turn, accuses India of fomenting violence on its Northwest Frontier and strife-torn Karachi.

Washington also claimed its old ally, former ISI chief Hamid Gul, was involved. General Gul is well known to me from the days of the anti-Soviet Afghan jihad.

Gul is a Pakistani patriot, not a terrorist. His real crime in US eyes: calling Taliban `freedom fighters’ and blaming the US government for the 9/11 attacks, a view 30% of Americans also share.

Pakistan bowed to US pressure and arrested Lashkar’s leaders.
Pakistan is bankrupt. Its cash reserves were stolen during Musharraf’s dictatorship. Pakistan now subsists entirely on American money, a humiliating comedown for a nation founded as a beacon of good government, justice and Islamic rectitude.

Most Pakistanis ardently support the Kashmiri liberation struggle as Pakistan’s national cause and most important strategic concern.

KASHMIR/But after 9/11, the US put a gun to Pakistan’s head, forcing Musharraf to both support to the US war in Afghanistan, and denounce Pakistan’s ally, Taliban, and the Kashmiri jihadis, as `terrorists.’

The US and India were delighted. India always claimed the Kashmir uprising was due to `cross-border terrorism’ from Pakistan, though the revolt was a genuine national uprising against Indian misrule.

Pakistanis were outraged by this double betrayal, calling Musharraf an American stooge. Now, President Asif Zardari’s feeble new government is continuing the same policy under US pressure, to the anger and contempt of many Pakistanis. He is seen as being even more subservient to Washington than his hated predecessor, Pervez Musharraf.

Pakistan has two governments: civilian and military. The generals and ISI have never abandoned their goal of a Pakistani-dominated Afghanistan, or continuing the Kashmir jihad. Both are seen as vital national interests. Pakistan’s generals look with derision and distaste on Zardari, who is dogged by accusations of gross corruption and malfeasance.

Washington has rented 130,000 Pakistani soldiers to wage war against Pashtun tribesmen allied to Taliban on Pakistan’s Northwest Frontier. The US pays their salaries and provides them with food and transport. These rented soldiers, or `sepoys,’ as the British Raj used to call its native troops, detest their mission. The once proud Pakistani army has become a mercenary force.

Now, in response to the deteriorating military situation in Afghanistan, the Pentagon is putting together a plan to send more divisions of its rented Pakistani Army to fight Taliban and other resistance forces in Afghanistan.

Few Americans understand the growing radicalization of Pakistan caused by Washington forcing its rulers and soldiers to go against the sentiments and interests of the nation.

Instead, the US keeps listening to the westernized Pakistani elite, less than 1% of the population, and left-leaning `experts,’ like Ahmad Rashid, who keep telling Washington what it wants to hear, rather than hard truths.

The festering Kashmir conflict that pits nuclear armed India and Pakistan against each other lies behind the Mumbai massacre. Solving this dangerous business must be as high a priority for the great powers as ending murderous attacks on civilians.

Endlessly repeating the mantra about `fighting terrorism’ will not solve the dangerous conflicts in South Asia or the Mideast.

Copyright Eric S. Margolis 2008 Toronto Sun.

Related:
Lashkar Bashing
Kashmir – the Forgotten Occupation

Thanks to Mubasher for sending this in.

h1

Al-Da’awa: India Should Hand Over Hindu Terrorists To Pakistan

December 10, 2008

_38508549_saeed150This is what most Pakistanis hoped to hear from their political leaders. But they have proven once again that they love their foreign houses and bank accounts more than the homeland. With all their empty arrogance, not a single Pakistani official dared make a single bold statement against the barrage of Indian B.S.

When people like Ahmed Mukhtar, the defense minister, and Khursheed Shah, another PPP minister, were sheepishly justifying their government’s weak responses to American and Indian arrogance, it was the Pakistan Air Force Chief who came out to contradict them. These politicians were exposed for who they are. This also exposes the unworkable Pakistani democracy that always brings to power the worst of the worst.

Unlike these ‘leaders’, Jamaat al Daawah is made up of honorable men. We might disagree with some of their ideas but not with their intentions. Facing belligerent Indian statements, the Pakistani charity group, Jama’at al Da’awah, has made a demand for the extradition of Indian Hindu terror suspects involved in killing Pakistanis on Indian soil, as they did when they burned Pakistanis alive in Samjota Express, the so-called ‘friendship’ train.

Read the full AhmedQuraishi.com Report
and our recent article on Lashkar Bashing.

h1

Lashkar Bashing

December 6, 2008
Dec 5, 2008 | Dan Qayyum | PakistanKaKhudaHafiz.com

_42587247_train_flames416grabNew Delhi, Feb 19 2007: Wahid Khan had come to the Old Delhi Railway Station here last night to see off his relatives who were going to Pakistan to attend a marriage.

Shock and disbelief writ large on his face, Khan, a resident of adjoining Ghaziabad, was back at the station this morning frantically looking for information about his relatives as news came in of twin explosions on the Samjhauta Express. Khan’s 70-year-old mother, brother Tariqat (25) and friend Isteghar were on the train.

“They were going to Pakistan to attend a marriage function. They were so happy to be able to go to Pakistan. I am just hoping somebody tells me they are safe and sound,” he said.

Sixty-eight-year-old Mohammad Ali came to the station looking for his son Tanveer’s father-in-law, Afzal Khan who had come from Pakistan to attend a function and was going back. Afzal’s wife and his 18-year-old daughter Tanya were also with him on the train and their whereabouts were unknown.

Ali complained that railway authorities were not forthcoming in giving any information regarding the incident.

“Probably, we have to go to Panipat to get the exact information,” he said.

These are only two such tragic stories.

As the Samjhauta Express, its two coaches on fire and its passengers screaming for help, stopped at the railway crossing in Siwa, the villagers were in for an experience they would never forget.

Satnarayan, who was among the first to reach the spot, said he will never forget the sight of the two train coaches on fire.

“Huge flames leapt out of the windows of the coaches and smoke billowed out. There were people inside the coaches who were screaming for help,” he said.

Before the smoke had even settled down, both the Indian media as well as government authorities were pointing the finger at Pakistan, and in particular, Lashkar-e-Taiba. Ofcourse we now know that it was infact right-wing Hindu terrorists, among them a serving Indian military officer, who caused this carnage in an attempt to malign Pakistan and Lashkar-e-Taiba.

Lashkar-e-Taiba

Lashkar-e-Taiba is a militant organization fighting the forced Indian occupation in Kashmir. They have been known to be the most lethal, technologically advanced, highly trained and the most destructive force among all of the Kashmiri resistance groups and have been bleeding the Indian occupation forces in Kashmir for years now. In accordance with Islamic teachings, they have a policy of not attacking civilians, and have denounced countless terrorist acts targeting civilians in both India and Pakistan.

In addition to their resolve and ability, one of the reasons Lashkar-e-Taiba has been so effective in Kashmir is the popular support they enjoy among ordinary Kashmiris. Hundreds of thousands of Kashmiris have taken to the streets this year demanding freedom from India, chanting such slogans as ‘India teri maut ai, lashkar aai lashkar aai’ and ‘lashkar-e-taiba se rishta kya, la ilaha il-Allah’ (Watch Video).

Blaming Lashkar-e-Taiba is not only a great diversion for the understandably angry Indian public looking at their leaders for answers, it also helps paint Lashkar-e-Taiba as mindless terrorists and Pakistan as a state sponsor of Terrorism. Pointing towards the ‘traditional enemy’ means they can’t be held accountable, and provides the perfect cover for home grown Hindu terrorists, giving them a free hand to keep slaughtering Muslims and Christians in India.

Mumbai

Within the first half an hour of the attacks in Mumbai, the Indian media had once again started pointing the finger at Pakistan. They now claim to have caught a terrorist who’s confessed to being trained by Pakistan’s ISI at camps run by Lashkar-e-Taiba.

It is interesting to note that after the 2006 bombings on Mumbai’s trains, the Indians claimed to have caught ‘Pakistani lashkar members’ who had confessed links with ISI. All seven of them later withdrew their confessions in court.

India has a history of blaming everything under the sun on Pakistanis, the ISI and Lashkar-e-Taiba, and has threatened to attack Jama’at-ud-Dawa’s headquarters in Muridke, which the Indians claim holds training camps run by Lashkar-e-Taiba.

Jama’at-ud-Dawa

PAKISTAN-SASIA-QUAKE-1YEAR-JIHADISJama’at-ud-Dawa was a established in 1985 as a charity, and are credited with building and running hundreds of hospitals and schools all over Pakistan. They have won international acclaim for their role in distaster management and providing relief to disaster victims all over the world, most notably in the earthquakes in Pakistan in 2005 and 2008.

They have provided emergency relief, aid, run medical camps and mobile operation units in some of the most impoverished rural areas of Pakistan.

Militants, they’re not. And while they may morally support all freedom movements around the world including in Kashmir (most Pakistanis do), they are a separate entity altogether to LeT which operates only in occupied Kashmir.

Empty threats?

In response to Indian allegations and threats, Jama’t-ud-Dawa yesterday took the unprecedented step of opening up their facilities to the media (BBC: Peaceful School or Terror Base?) to prove that the Indian allegations are false, yet again.

Meanwhile, Lashkar-e-Taiba has denied involvement in the Mumbai attacks and told the Indians to look at home, just as they did after the Samjhauta Express bombings – in response to Indian allegations then.

And guess what, they were right.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 45 other followers